454 Hoja de ruta reduccion necesidad de AB by Health for Animals (Tools & Checklists)

 

 

454 Tools & Checklists – Hoja de ruta reduccion necesidad de AB by Health for Animals

454 Tools & Checklists
Hoja de ruta reduccion necesidad de AB by Health for Animals
In Significant Impact Groups:
Species targeted: Pigs; Poultry; Dairy; Beef; Sheep;
Age:
Summary:
This document has been produced by HealthforAnimals, the Global Federation of Veterinary Medicines. HealthforAnimals represents the animal health sector: manufacturers of veterinary medicines, vaccines and other animal health products worldwide, as as well as associations representing companies at national and regional level. The document sets out the principles for the reduction of antibiotic use through prevention, correct and early detection and finally through precise treatment.
Where to find the original material: https://healthforanimals.org/downloads/library/hoja_de_ruta_para_reducir_la_necesidad_de_uso_de_loa_antibioticos.pdf;
Country: Belgium;

453 – Buenas practicas uso de AB de EPRUMA by EPRUMA (Tools & Checklists)

 

 

453 Tools & Checklists – Buenas practicas uso de AB de EPRUMA by EPRUMA

453 Tools & Checklists
Buenas practicas uso de AB de EPRUMA by EPRUMA
In Significant Impact Groups:
Species targeted: Pigs; Poultry; Dairy; Beef; Sheep;
Summary:
The intention of this document is to contribute to the maintenance of antimicrobial effectiveness by providing a descriptive framework of good practice. The implementation of the key aspects of this framework is compatible with its adaptation to the particular conditions of each Member State. In this way a coordinated and integrated approach can be achieved across the EU, but tailored to the specific needs of each Member State. The EPRUMA initiative is intended as a complement to Integrated Agriculture*. with regard to the rational use of agricultural means of production, as set out in the European Framework for Integrated Agriculture (EISA).
453 Tools & Checklists – Buenas practicas uso de AB de EPRUMA by EPRUMA
Where to find the original material: https://www.veterindustria.com/v_portal/inc/clicklink.asp?t=3&cod=15498&c=1&s=364839167;
Country: Belgium;

452 – Plan estrategico lucha contra resistencias a antimicrobianos 2019 by AEMPS (Tools & Checklists)

 

 

452 Tools & Checklists – Plan estrategico lucha contra resistencias a antimicrobianos 2019 by AEMPS

452 Tools & Checklists
Plan estrategico lucha contra resistencias a antimicrobianos 2019 by AEMPS
In Significant Impact Groups:
Species targeted: Pigs; Poultry; Dairy; Beef; Sheep;
Summary:
The Spanish Agency for Medicines and Healthcare Products (AEMPS) has coordinated the development of the national plan to combat antibiotic resistance. This plan, coordinated between human and veterinary medicine, has different levels of action with implementation objectives. The second plan was approved in 2019.
452 Tools & Checklists – Plan estrategico lucha contra resistencias a antimicrobianos 2019 by AEMPS
Where to find the original material: https://resistenciaantibioticos.es/es/system/files/field/files/pran_2019-2021_0.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=497&force=0;
Country: Spain

451 – Plan estrategico lucha resistencia a antimicrobianos by AEMPS (Tools & Checklists)

 

 

451 Tools & Checklists – Plan estrategico lucha resistencia a antimicrobianos by AEMPS

451 Tools & Checklists
Plan estrategico lucha resistencia a antimicrobianos by AEMPS
In Significant Impact Groups:
Species targeted: Pigs; Poultry; Dairy; Beef; Sheep;
Summary:
The Spanish Agency for Medicines and Healthcare Products (AEMPS) has coordinated the development of the national plan to combat antibiotic resistance. This plan, coordinated between human and veterinary medicine, has different levels of action with implementation objectives. The first plan was developed and approved in 2014.
451 Tools & Checklists – Plan estrategico lucha resistencia a antimicrobianos by AEMPS
Where to find the original material: https://www.aemps.gob.es/publicaciones/publica/plan-estrategico-antibioticos/v2/docs/plan-estrategico-antimicrobianos-AEMPS.pdf;
Country: Spain;

 

447 – Antimicrobial use and resistance in swine waste treatment systems (Research paper – Jindal – 2006)

 

 

447 Research paper – Jindal – 2006 – Antimicrobial use and resistance in swine waste treatment systems

447 Research paper
Antimicrobial use and resistance in swine waste treatment systems by Jindal, A., Kocherginskaya, S., Mehboob, A., Robert, M., Mackie, R. I., Raskin, L., & Zilles, J. L. 2006 Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 7813-7820
In Significant Impact Groups: Pathogen management \  Precision Livestock Farming & Early detection
Species targeted: Pigs;
Age: Not stated;
Summary:
Chlortetracycline and the macrolide tylosin were identified as commonly used antimicrobials for growth promotion and prophylaxis in swine production. Resistance to these antimicrobials was measured throughout the waste treatment processes at five swine farms by culture-based and molecular methods. Conventional farm samples had the highest levels of resistance with both culture-based and molecular methods and had similar levels of resistance despite differences in antimicrobial usage. The levels of resistance in organic farm samples, where no antimicrobials were used, were very low by a culture-based method targeting fecal streptococci. The levels of tetracycline and MLSB resistance remained high throughout the waste treatment systems, suggesting that the potential impact of land application of treated wastes and waste treatment by-products on environmental levels of resistance should be investigated further.
447 Research paper – Jindal – 2006 – Antimicrobial use and resistance in swine waste treatment systems
Where to find the original material: https://aem.asm.org/content/72/12/7813; 10.1128/AEM.01087-06
Country: US

445 – Sewage sludge and liquid pig manure as possible sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria (Research paper – Hölzel – 2010)

 

 

445 Research paper – Hölzel – 2010 – Sewage sludge and liquid pig manure as possible sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria

445 Research paper
Sewage sludge and liquid pig manure as possible sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria
by Hölzel, C. S., Schwaiger, K., Harms, K., Küchenhoff, H., Kunz, A., Meyer, K., … Bauer, J. (2010). 2010 Environmental Research 110: 318-326
In Significant Impact Groups: Pathogen management \ Prudent use AB
Species targeted: Pigs;
Age: Not stated;
Summary:
In this study, liquid pig manure (n=305) and sewage sludge (n=111) – used as agricultural fertilizers between 2002 and 2005 – were investigated for the presence of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Bacteria were tested for their resistance against 40 chemotherapeutics including several “reserve drugs”. E. coli (n=613) from pig manure were at a significantly higher degree resistant to streptomycin, doxycycline, spectinomycin, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol than E. coli (n=116) from sewage sludge. Enterococci (Ent. faecalis, n=387, and Ent. faecium, n=183) from pig manure were significantly more often resistant to high levels of doxycycline, rifampicin, erythromycin, and streptomycin than Ent. faecalis (n=44) and Ent. faecium (n=125) from sewage sludge. Significant differences in enterococcal resistance were also seen for tylosin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin high level, fosfomycin, clindamicin, enrofloxacin, moxifloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. High rates of (multi-) resistant bacteria in pig manure emphasize the need for a prudent – cautious – use of antibiotics in farm animals.
445 Research paper – Hölzel – 2010 – Sewage sludge and liquid pig manure as possible sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria
Where to find the original material: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20303077/; 10.1016/j.envres.2010.02.009
Country: DE

 

442 – Use of antimicrobials in food animals and impact of transmission of antimicrobial resistance on humans (Research paper – Ma – 2020)

 

 

442 Research paper – Ma – 2020 – Use of antimicrobials in food animals and impact of transmission of antimicrobial resistance on humans

442 Research paper
Use of antimicrobials in food animals and impact of transmission of antimicrobial resistance on humans by Ma, F., Xu, S., Tang, Z., Li, Z., & Zhang, L. 2020 Biosafety and Health : 07-Jan
In Significant Impact Groups: AMU reduction strategies \ Legislation and incentives; Government
Species targeted: Pigs; Poultry; Dairy; Beef;
Age: Not stated;
Summary:
Humans can acquire antimicrobial resistance from drugs through the food chain or the environment (contaminated water, air, soil, or manure). While antimicrobials have been regular supplements in animal feed that maintain health and improve productivity of livestock, their over-use in feeding forage has led to a rise in antibacterial resistance. This review summarizes the current use of antimicrobials in livestock, the harmful effects of antimicrobial resistance, and the comprehensive combat measures.
442 Research paper – Ma – 2020 – Use of antimicrobials in food animals and impact of transmission of antimicrobial resistance on humans
Where to find the original material: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053620301099?via%3Dihub; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2020.09.004
Country: CN

439 – Industrial food animal production antimicrobial resistance and human health (Research paper – Silbergeld – 2008)

 

 

439 Research paper – Silbergeld – 2008 – Industrial food animal production antimicrobial resistance and human health

439 Research paper
Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health by Silbergeld, E. K., Graham, J., & Price, L. B. 2008 Annual Review of Public Health 29: 151-169
In Significant Impact Groups: AMU reduction strategies \ Legislation and incentives; Food supply chain and markets
Species targeted: Pigs; Poultry; Dairy; Beef;
Age: Not stated;
Summary:
1. The use of antimicrobials as feed additives in food animal production is a major cause of increasing antimicrobial resistance in human pathogens. This use accounts for much of total drug production and is increasing worldwide.2. Agricultural antimicrobial use results in the exposure of farmers, farm workers, rural communities, and the general public to antimicrobial resistant pathogens, as well as contamination of air, water, and soils near food animal production sites.3. For public health, the most significant impact of agricultural antimicrobial use is the expansion of reservoirs of resistance because these genes can be transferred widely among microbial communities.4. Reducing or banning agricultural antimicrobial use can reduce risks of antimicrobial resistance in the food supply.5. Disposal of animal waste is a major route of environmental contamination by antimicrobials and resistance determinants.6. Farmers and farm workers are at significantly increased risks of infection by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria; they may serve as entry points for the general community and transfers into health care settings
439 Research paper – Silbergeld – 2008 – Industrial food animal production antimicrobial resistance and human health
Where to find the original material: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090904; 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090904
Country: USA

437 – Antibiotic resistance genes from livestock waste -occurrence dissemination and treatment (Research paper – He – 2020)

 

 

437 Research paper – He – 2020 – Antibiotic resistance genes from livestock waste_occurrence dissemination and treatment

437 Research paper
Antibiotic resistance genes from livestock waste: occurrence, dissemination, and treatment by He, Y., Yuan, Q., Mathieu, J., Stadler, L., Senehi, N., Sun, R., & Alvarez, P. J. J. 2020 npj Clean Water 3: 11-Jan
In Significant Impact Groups: Other
Species targeted: Poultry; Dairy; Pigs; Beef; Sheep; Other;
Age: Not stated;
Summary:
Antibiotics are widely used in animal husbandry, and various types of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are frequently detected in livestock waste around the world. Conventional livestock waste treatment processes do not completely remove ARGs, resulting in their release to soil and water environments. Various exposure routes of these ARGs to humans, including inhalation and ingestion of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) that harbor them, may be contributing to the rise in resistant clinical infections that are increasingly difficult to treat with antibiotics. In this review, we assess the occurrence and variability of ARGs in livestock wastes and their potential propagation pathways to human pathogens.
437 Research paper – He – 2020 – Antibiotic resistance genes from livestock waste- occurrence dissemination and treatment
Where to find the original material: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41545-020-0051-0; 10.1038/s41545-020-0051-0
Country: Global

436 Water medication calculator by 3Tres3 (Tools & Checklists)

 

 

436 Tools & Checklists – Water medication calculator by 3Tres3

436 Tools & Checklists
Water medication calculator by 3Tres3
In Significant Impact Groups:
Species targeted: Pigs;
Age:
Summary:
This simulator calculates the amount of medicine to be incorporated into the water when using a flow meter. To calculate the mother solution we must enter our data. If the amount of water consumed is not known, the simulator provides an approximation based on the number of animals, their weight, temperature and the amount of water wasted. In any case, from the amount of mother solution consumed on the first day of medication, the real water consumption can be calculated.
Where to find the original material: https://www.3tres3.com/simulador-medicacion-en-agua
Country: Spain;